4 Comments
User's avatar
Steve's avatar

Sums up the dilemma very well. The worst case scenario has to be 7+ wins with Watson. Surely there's no way they'd extend him with his contract and injury history.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 22
Comment deleted
Steve's avatar

In a sane world you'd hope not. But imagine the scenario, Watson stays upright for 17 games and wins 8 in a soft schedule, all the questions around Sanders remain and the top teams in the draft are so QB needy they're not interested in trading down. Even in that situation you'd hope they'd never consider it, but who knows.

Brad Ward's avatar

I can’t imagine it unless he won job & played top 10 level ball including a playoff game victory - and he is a major reason why. Would that be enough? Still tough.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 22Edited
Comment deleted
Dan's avatar

I’ve been saying something along these lines as well. Most starting QBs are top 5 picks, but there are some guys taken later (some much later) who are quite good and worth building around. I’d rather have them play competitive football and start building a winning culture than lose 14-15 games to get the #1 or #2 pick. If the offensive ecosystem is good, it can help prop up a QB who maybe has less physical talent while he gets the mental side of the game down and really learns the nuances of the offense.